Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

755 So. 2d 178

Prado v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-04-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 2002

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-04-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Valentine C. Prado appeals the trial court’s denial of his dispositive motion to suppress and his sentence under the 1995 sentencing guidelines. This appeal was stayed pending the supreme court’s ruling in Heggs v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S137, — So.2d -, 2000 WL 178052 (Fla. Feb. *17917, 2000). However, on January 9, 2000, Mr. Prado completed his prison sentence and was released. The sentencing issue is thus moot. We affirm without further discussion the denial of Mr. Prado’s motion to suppress.

¶2Affirmed.

PATTERSON, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.
/755/so2d/178 · .json · Public domain