755 So. 2d 2 - Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 697 So. 2d 777 - Coleman v. State · 667 So. 2d 622 - Atterberry v. State · Laney v. State · 595 So. 2d 840 - Morris v. State · 688 So. 2d 727 - Medina v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the trial court has made a finding that the evidence does not show a probability that the defendant is incapable of making a rational defense, this Court will not overturn that finding unless the finding was manifestly against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The decision to grant or deny a motion for a continuance is within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be grounds for reversal unless shown to have resulted in manifest injustice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bridges v. State“will not consider matters which do not appear in the record and must confine [ourselves] to what actually does appear in the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.