Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 755 SO2D 696 - Arnold v. State

Arnold v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lynce v. Mathis · Knight v. State · Hunter v. State · Barfield v. State · 683 So. 2d 109 - Gwong v. Singletary

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In evaluating whether a law violates the ex post facto clause, a two-prong test must be applied: (1) whether the law is retrospective in its effect; and (2) whether the law alters the definition of criminal conduct or increases the penalty by which a crime is punishable.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.