Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 755 SW2D 505 - Morris v. State

Morris v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
April 1996
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 228th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · David W. McKay v. Texas · Rose v. State · Landry v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “One thing I would like [to] point out to you right now — and if I don’t do a real good job explaining it to you, please ask the foreman to reread this part of the charge. I am afraid sometimes at first blush when the charge is read, the law that’s given to you on parole says that the defendant will be eligible for parole after he serves one-third of his sentence. Ladies and gentlemen how it reads is that he will not become eligible for parole until the applicable time served plus good conduct time equals a third. Doesn’t say he has to serve a third, it says applicable time and good conduct time equal a third. Let’s keep that in mind when you go back there and make your decision.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.