Peake v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 185th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Burks v. United States · Greene v. Massey · Thomas v. State · McGoldrick v. State · United States v. Wright-Barker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[STATE]: I beg the Court's indulgence. I would like again to reurge the admissibility of the tape or allow the State to research the law even further. I'm confident I could bring the Court even more cases to show that tape is admissible. I'm worried about the consequences of this trial since I mentioned the tape in my opening argument, fully believing that it would be admissible. * * * * * * [COURT]: I'll tell you what I'll do. I'll cure that. I'm not going to do that: but I'll allow I'll require the defense to not make mention of the fact you didn't bring a tape so you won't get into that situation, since it wasn't brought. So we'llthat wayI know what you're saying, It happens sometime. `Well, they said we're going to do this and that. Why didn't they? Must be hiding something.' So I don't want that happening. If the defense does slip and do it, then I'll open it up. [DEFENSE]: Oh, no. [COURT]: That should be strong enough for them not to get you into that trick bag. Let's bring the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Peake v. State“[w]here a statement by the Government in opening argument is not substantiated at trial by a subsequent ruling by the trial judge, both the good faith on the part of the prosecution and the impact of the statement in the context of the particular trial must be assessed. United States v. Akin, 562 F.2d 459, 466 (7th Cir.1977); United States v. Prieto, 505 F.2d 8, 12 (5th Cir.1974).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Peake v. State“expressly ordered defense counsel not to discuss the failure of the State to introduce the confession.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Peake v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.