Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 755 S.W.2d 850 - State v. Markham

State v. Markham’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2016

13 state decisions

901988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Hammersley · Pace v. State · State v. Watkins · State v. Poplar · State v. Holland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The cases cited by the State affirm that the circumstances of the crime and the need for deterrence may be of such overwhelming significance that they outweigh all other factors. However, those cases do not hold that the district attorney general may disregard other relevant factors and consider only the circumstances of the crime and need for deterrence. An applicant may present and the district attorney general must consider evidence which tends to show that the applicant is amenable to correction and is not likely to commit further criminal acts.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Herron · State v. Washington
  2. “Among the factors to be considered in addition to the circumstances of the offense are the defendant’s criminal record, social history, the physical and mental condition of a defendant where appropriate, and the likelihood that pretrial diversion will serve the ends of justice and the best interest of both the public and the defendant.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. McKim · State v. Washington

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.