Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

756 A.2d 465

In re O'Driscoll

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 2000-07-27

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2018

1 district · 9 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-07-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2On consideration of the petition of the Board on Professional Responsibility the “Board” for suspension of respondent for disability pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 13(c), the report and recommendation pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 17(b), the letter from Bar Counsel taking no exception to the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, and respondent having interposed no objection thereto, it is

¶3ORDERED that respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, effective immediately, until further order of the Court, pursuant to Rule XI, § 13(c). Respondent’s reinstatement to the District of Columbia Bar shall be in accordance with the provisions of D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 13(g). It is

¶4FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall file an affidavit in compliance with D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14(g), and shall serve copies of the affidavit on Bar Counsel and the Board on Professional Responsibility.

/756/a2d/465 · .json · Public domain