Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 756 F.2d 1500 - Proffitt v. Wainwright

Proffitt v. Wainwright’s Empirical Analysis

756 F.2d 1500 · 1985

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 1998
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · Lockett v. Ohio · Proffitt v. Florida · Spaziano v. Florida · Barclay v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[ Spaziano ' s ] reasoning calls into question whether any given error in such a merely”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the mitigating circumstances which you may consider, if established by the evidence, are these: [listing statutory mitigating circumstances].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the sentencing proceeding is so central to Florida's capital sentencing scheme that [a defendant] cannot be resentenced by the judge alone.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.