Fearon v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis
756 F.2d 267 · 1985
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2010
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Padilla-Martinez v. United States · Feddersen Motors, Inc. v. Ward · Stirling v. Chemical Bank · United States v. Stolarz · Jackson v. Salon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it [to] determine whether to treat the notice of appeal as an application for extension of time pursuant to Rule 4(a)(5) and whether, in the interests of justice, the late appeal should be allowed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Campos v. LeFevre
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.