United States v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis
756 F.2d 310 · 1985
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2014
12 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on Franks v. Delaware · Berger v. United States · Kentucky v. Indiana · Addington v. Texas · United States v. Myers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“leaves the question of whether to exclude the . . . [testimony] to the trial court's discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he primary purpose of Rule 12.1 is clearly to prevent surprise at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.