Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 756 F.2d 353 - United States v. Mize

United States v. Mize’s Empirical Analysis

756 F.2d 353 · 1985

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
May 2014
most recently cited

32 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently May 2014 · most notably United States v. Baytank (Houston), Inc. (1991), United States v. Davis (1996)

32 federal appellate ·

1401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1005 · 18 U.S.C. § 656 · 18 U.S.C. § 657 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on Burks v. United States · Stirone v. United States · Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer · Lewis v. Illinois · United States v. Ylda

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We reach this result with great reluctance, for although Mize's guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt, the inconvenience and expense of retrial are now necessary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “means and includes any national bank, state bank, or bank and trust company; which has become a member of one of the Federal Reserve banks; and”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Id. at 355. The district court instructed the jury that it could convict if, among other things, the government established that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.