Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 756 F.2d 696 - Simon v. United States

Simon v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

756 F.2d 696 · 1985

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
April 2004
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 2004 · most notably Sprague v. Bowen (1987), Jea Min Han v. United States (1991)

16 federal appellate · 1 district ·

130198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6323 · 26 U.S.C. § 6325 · 26 U.S.C. § 7425 · 5 U.S.C. § 706

Relies on Schweiker v. Hansen · Lombard v. Marcera · Environmental Protection Agency v. Brown · 20 Cal. 3d 694 - Caito v. United California Bank · Schuster v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Payment [was] made by the subrogee to protect his own interest. (2) The subrogee [has] not ... acted as a volunteer. (3) The debt paid [was] one for which the subrogee was not primarily liable. (4) The entire debt [has] been paid. (5) Subrogation [would] not work any injustice to the rights of others.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether there is a genuine issue of material fact, and, if not, whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.