Jordan v. Epps’s Empirical Analysis
756 F.3d 395 · 2014
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Slack v. McDaniel · Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · North Carolina v. Pearce · Gregg v. Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is not vindictive for a prosecutor to follow through on a threat made during plea negotiations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“absent an increase in charges beyond those raised in the original indictment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“While the Ninth Circuit may have taken a different approach to this question,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.