United States v. Shellef’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206
Relies on Caminetti v. United States · United States v. Santos · Henderson v. United States · Zedner v. United States · United States v. Dennis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]bsent specific findings, [that provision] could be used by a court to justify an open-ended exclusion that is not linked to any particular court event or reason”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Counsel]: It seems to me that if [the government’s attorney] is talking about if, as he puts it, creating three new indictments, I think he has to go back to the grand jury, and we would not waive that. [Court]: My stomach says you are right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.