Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 756 NW2D 216 - State v. Garcia

State v. Garcia’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
4
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2020

14 state decisions

120200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Piddington · 152 Ill. 2d 418 - People v. Wegielnik · Severson v. Sueppel · State v. Wallin · State v. Hitchens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. A person who has been requested to submit to a chemical test shall be advised by a peace officer of the following: a. If the person refuses to submit to the test, the person’s driver’s license or nonresident operating privilege will be revoked by the department as required by and for the applicable period specified under section 321J.9. b. If the person submits to the test and the results indicate the presence of a controlled substance or other drug, or an alcohol concentration equal to or in excess of the level prohibited by section 321J.2 or 321J.2A, the person’s driver’s license or nonresident operating privilege will be revoked by the department as required by and for the applicable period specified under section 321J.12.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “also requires consideration of the fact that alcohol dissipates from the blood over time, particularly after the subject has stopped drinking,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “whether the implied consent warnings were sufficiently administered must not depend upon the perception of the accused driver.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.