Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 756 P2D 780 - Hoem v. State

Hoem v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
10
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably 185 W. Va. 684 - Lewis v. Canaan Valley Resorts, Inc. (1991), Condemarin v. University Hospital (1989)

29 state decisions — followed in 10 states

17019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer · Munn v. Illinois · Korematsu v. United States · Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It cannot seriously be contended that the extension of special benefits to the medical profession and the imposition of an additional hurdle in the path of medical malpractice victims relate to the protection of the public health.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"[T]here must be some difference which furnishes a reasonable basis for different legislation as to different classes, and the differences must not be arbitrary and without just relation to the subject of the legislation."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “not involve any political question of importance to the state but essentially touch[ed] upon private interests.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.