Harvard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 5, 2000

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-04-05

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2003

2 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California · 506 So. 2d 88 - Cornett v. State · State v. Kamins

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-04-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1In this Anders1 appeal, appellant’s counsel states that appellant’s probation was properly revoked on the basis of his termination from the PAR program and his possession of cocaine. Our review of the record leads us to agree with counsel that the violations were willful and substantial and that the revocation was proper. However, because the record does not contain a written order of revocation, we remand to the trial court for entry of a written order of revocation. See Cornett v. State, 506 So.2d 88 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Givens v. State, 666 So.2d 235 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

¶2Remanded with directions.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

¶3. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).