Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

756 So. 2d 1093

Monds v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-05-03

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 2017

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-05-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This is an appeal from a summary denial of a Rule 3.850 motion. Because the trial court denied the facially sufficient motion ■without attaching portions of the record to conclusively refute appellant’s claims, we reverse and remand for such attachments or for an evidentiary hearing on the motion.

FARMER, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.
/756/so2d/1093 · .json · Public domain