Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

756 So. 2d 154

Rodarm v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-03-15

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2000

1 state decisions

Relies on 741 So. 2d 512 - McCloud v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-03-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm appellant’s conviction for commission of an indecent act on a child under 16 years of age on all issues raised, noting that many of the points on appeal were not objected to or preserved at trial. As to the assessment of points on appellant’s scoresheet for penetration, appellant argues that it was error to include those additional points because the jury did not make a finding of penetration. However, we agree with McCloud v. State, 741 So.2d 512, 514 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)(en banc) and hold that “the scoring of victim injury points under section 921.0024, Florida Statutes (1997) is a ‘sentencing factor,’ not *155an element . of the offense.-... Penetration as a sentencing factor plainly does not need to be charged, nor must it be decided by a jury, nor must it be decided beyond a reasonable doubt.” (Emphasis in original)(footnote and citation omitted).

¶2Affirmed.

WARNER, C.J., SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.
/756/so2d/154 · .json · Public domain