Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

756 So. 2d 230

State v. Wheeler

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-04-26

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2016

4 state decisions

Relies on 594 So. 2d 273 - Williams v. State · 545 So. 2d 392 - Madrigal v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-04-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The state appeals from an order invalidating a sentence which the parties previously stipulated in a plea agreement would be imposed if, as actually occurred, the defendant violated the probation which was granted as a condition of suspending the sentence. We find no basis whatever for this ruling both because the sentence was not an illegal one and because the defendant could not properly be heard to contend otherwise after receiving the benefit of the bargain. See Madrigal v. State, 545 So.2d 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Accordingly, the order under review is reversed and the cause remanded for appropriate sentencing in accordance with the prior agreement and the applicable law. See Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273 (Fla.1992).

/756/so2d/230 · .json · Public domain