Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 756 So. 2d 336 - State v. Brooks

756 So. 2d 336 - State v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 360 So. 2d 500 - State v. Drew · State Ex Rel. Porter v. Butler · 670 So. 2d 713 - State v. Pyke · 362 So. 2d 744 - State v. Guzman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Neither possession of a firearm by a convicted felon nor illegal carrying of weapons requires actual physical possession of a firearm upon the person of the accused; constructive possession of a firearm satisfies the possessory element. State v. Armentor, 94-745 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/1/95) ; 649 So.2d 1187 , writ denied, 95-0557 (La.6/30/95); 657 So.2d 1027 , citing State v. Day, 410 So.2d 741 (La. 1982). Constructive possession exists when the illegal object is subject to the defendant's dominion and control. State v. Johnson, 463 So.2d 778 (La.App. 4 Cir.1985).”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Guilty knowledge is an essential element in proving constructive possession [of a firearm] and may be inferred from the circumstances.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “If the offender uses, possesses, or has under his immediate control any firearm, or other instrumentality customarily used or intended for probable use as a dangerous weapon, while committing or attempting to commit a crime of violence or while in the possession of or during the sale or distribution of a controlled dangerous substance, the offender shall be fined not more than ten thousand dollars and imprisoned at hard labor for not less than five nor more than ten years without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.