Brazeal v. Brazeal’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 57 Ala. App. 230 - Binns v. Maddox · Bowden v. Bowden · 685 So. 2d 732 - Self v. Self · 690 So. 2d 407 - Vlahos v. Ware · 587 So. 2d 363 - Crawford v. Bullock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]he purpose of Social Security is the same as that of an insurance policy with a private carrier, wherein a parent insures against death or loss of physical ability to fulfill moral and legal obligations to dependent children. The premiums on such insurance may be said to have been paid either by the parent or by the parent and [the] employer. The benefits of Social Security are not gratuitous. The terms of ‘insured,’ ‘insurance,’ and ‘beneficiary’ are used throughout the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C.A. Chapt. 7. “The Supreme Court of the United States has referred to the Social Security system as social insurance and has said the right to the benefits is in one sense earned. Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603 , 80 S.Ct. 1367 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1435 (I960).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Adams v. Adams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.