Hudspeth v. Hudspeth’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 63rd Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Hudson v. Wakefield · Clyde v. Hamilton · Narisi v. Legend Diversified Investments · Lozano v. Patrician Movement · Estate of Stonecipher v. Estate of Butts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]very defect, omission or fault in a pleading either of form or of substance, which is not specifically pointed out by exception in writing and brought to the attention of the judge in the trial court before the instruction or charge to the jury or, in a non-jury case, before the judgment is signed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.