Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 756 SW2D 332 - Rogers v. State

Rogers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2014

9 state decisions

401988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Chapman v. State of California · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Schneble v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In addition to noting that appellant failed to request that the record reflect the substance of the gestures or demonstrations, we also note that he failed to object to them. Because this court must evaluate challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence by reviewing the record in the light most favorable to the verdict, we hold the testimony excerpted above, which indicates that not one but several demonstrations took place, supports the jury’s verdict. See Tex.R.App. P. 50(d).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.