Saucedo v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 293rd Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hernandez v. State · Houston v. State · Crocker v. State · Bridge v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In this chapter, “criminal episode” means the commission of two or more offenses, regardless of whether the harm is directed toward or inflicted upon more than one person or item of property, under the following circumstances: (1) the offenses are committed pursuant to the same transaction or pursuant to two or more transactions that are connected or constitute a common scheme or plan; or (2) the offenses are the repeated commission of the same or similar offenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Howell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.