Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 757 F.2d 1112 - Piambino v. Bailey

Piambino v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis

757 F.2d 1112 · 1985

Citation profile

232
cited by 232 later decisions
6
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

115 federal appellate · 3 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 232 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably General Motors Corporation Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation 94-1064 94-1194 94-1195 94-1198 94-1202 94-1203 94-1207 94-1208 94-1219 (1995), Weinberger v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp. (1991)

115 federal appellate · 3 district · 10 state decisions

90019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 94 · 15 U.S.C. § 45 (§ 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 77A (§ 1 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 1738

Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · McNabb v. United States · California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp. · Nixon v. Administrator of General Services · Klapprott v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 232 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court, upon receiving the mandate of an appellate court, may not alter, amend, or examine the mandate, or give any further relief or review but must enter an order in strict compliance with the mandate.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an intervening change in the controlling law [that] dictates a different result.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “as it is known, is nothing more than a specific application of the”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.