Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 757 F.2d 301 - Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass'n v. United States

Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass'n v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

757 F.2d 301 · 1985

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2013 · most notably Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc. (1990), 1995-1 Siegel Transfer Inc (1995)

34 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions

5001985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 49 U.S.C. § 10101 (Bus Regulatory Reform Act of 1982) · 49 U.S.C. § 10102 · 49 U.S.C. § 10702 · 49 U.S.C. § 10704 · 49 U.S.C. § 10706 · 49 U.S.C. § 10741 · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Warth v. Seldin · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Udall v. Tallman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a person providing motor vehicle transportation of property for compensation under continuing agreements with one or more persons— (i) by assigning motor vehicles for a continuing period of time for the exclusive use of each such person; or (ii) designed to meet the distinct needs of each such person.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “grant relief from this section to contract carriers [but not common carriers] when relief is consistent with the public interest and the transportation policy of section 10101 of this title.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'or any one of them, are suffering immediate or threatened injury as a result of the challenged action.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.