Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 757 F.2d 431 - In re Smith & Wesson

In re Smith & Wesson’s Empirical Analysis

757 F.2d 431 · 1985

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
July 1992
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 6 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 5 U.S.C. § 706

Relies on Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · United States v. Turkette · William Marbury v. James Madison · Russello v. United States · Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “28 U.S.C. Sec. 1491(a)(3) did not divest the district courts of jurisdiction in pre-award contract claims.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.