Maldonado v. Ramirez’s Empirical Analysis
757 F.2d 48 · 1985
Citation profile
32 federal appellate · 21 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 132 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2019 · most notably Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation (1990), Williams v. Borough of West Chester (1989)
32 federal appellate · 21 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 521 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 524
Relies on Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Drexel v. Union Prescription Centers, Inc. · Gordon v. Watson · Cummings v. Roberts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 132 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify in all matters stated therein.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A]n attorney given notice of the bankruptcy on behalf of a particular client is not called upon to review all of his or her files to ascertain whether any other client may also have a claim against the bankrupt. Notice sent to an authorized attorney or agent must at least signify the client for whom it is intended so that the attorney can know whom to advise to assert a claim in the bankruptcy.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a) A discharge under section 727, 1141, 1228(a), 1228(b), or 1328(b) of this title does not discharge an individual debtor from any debt— (3) neither listed nor scheduled under section 521(1) of this title, with the name, if known to the debtor, of the creditor to whom such debt is owed, in time to permit— (B) if such debt is of a kind specified in paragraph (2), (4) or (6) of this subsection, timely filing of a proof of claim and timely request for a determination of dischargeability of such debt under one of such paragraphs, unless such creditor had notice or actual knowledge of the case in time for such timely filing and request;”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.