Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 757 F.2d 734 - Brooks v. United States

Brooks v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

757 F.2d 734 · 1985

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2018 · most notably Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. Bonjorno (1990), Federal Deposit Insurance v. Wright (1991)

29 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

2301985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1961 · 28 U.S.C. § 2411 · 31 U.S.C. § 1304

Relies on Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond · Gerry v. United States · Moses Lake Homes, Inc. v. Grant County · United States v. Schooner Peggy · Briggs Transportation Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “replaced the directive for applying the state rate of interest with a nationwide variable rate of interest based upon a formula using the rate paid by the Government for 52-week treasury bills.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he delay is intended to provide time for planning the transition and for permitting the bar to become familiar with the provisions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'because that is the date on which the correct judgment should have been entered.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.