Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 757 F.2d 94 - Leroy v. Rc Marshall

Leroy v. Rc Marshall’s Empirical Analysis

757 F.2d 94 · 1985

Citation profile

88
cited by 88 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
December 2015
most recently cited

53 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 88 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2015 · most notably Harris v. Reed (1989), Hughes v. Idaho State Board of Corrections (1986)

53 federal appellate ·

4801985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Faretta v. California · Wainwright v. Sykes · Fay v. Noia · United States v. Frady · Engle v. Isaac

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial court’s instructions to the jury at the sentencing phase of the proceedings advised the jury that they must consider death first before commencing deliberation on either of the two life verdicts. This instruction is fundamentally unfair, and violates the Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] second or successive petition may be dismissed if the judge finds that it fails to allege new or different grounds for relief and the prior determination was on the merits....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'cause and prejudice' which would provide a legal justification for the federal court to look beyond the procedural bar....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.