Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 757 F.3d 1110 - Weinstein v. McClendon

Weinstein v. McClendon’s Empirical Analysis

757 F.3d 1110 · 2014

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
February 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. · Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. · Lawrence Greebel Richard Crane Brian Robinson John Ann Somers v. Ftp Software Inc · Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano · City of Philadelphia Ronald Goldstein v. Fleming Companies Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “so obviously material that the defendant must have been aware both of its materiality and that its non-disclosure would likely mislead investors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.