de Abarca v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
757 F.3d 334 · 2014
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Gebremichael v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Romilus v. Ashcroft · Orelien v. Gonzales · Singh v. Mukasey · Seng v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a generalized fear [of a gang's reputation] cannot be the basis for a claim of feared future persecution”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“General criminal activity is not evidence of a well-founded fear of . . . persecution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“); Vasili v. Holder, 732 F.3d 83, 91 (1st Cir. 2013) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.