Hurst v. Joyner’s Empirical Analysis
757 F.3d 389 · 2014
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Irvin v. Dowd · Remmer v. United States · Harrington v. Richter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“did not allege that Juror Foster discussed with her father the facts or evidence that had been presented in the trial, or the status of the jury's deliberations,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“where [she] could look in the Bible for help and guidance in making [her] decision for between life and death.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“evidence that Juror Foster's father expressed any opinion about the case or attempted to influence her vote,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.