Huon v. Johnson & Bell, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis
757 F.3d 556 · 2014
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on 184 Ill. 2d 290 - River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland Park · 151 Ill. 2d 285 - People Ex Rel. Burris v. Progressive Land Developers, Inc. · 232 Ill. 2d 302 - Blount v. Stroud · Ennenga v. Starns · Scherr v. Marriott International, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“determined pragmatically, giving weight to such considerations as whether the facts are related in time, space, origin, or motivation, whether they form a convenient trial unit, and whether their treatment as a unit conforms to the parties' expectations or business understanding or usage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“separate claims will be considered the same cause of action for purposes of res judicata if they arise from a single group of operative facts, regardless of whether they assert different theories of relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.