Carter v. Caleb Brett LLC’s Empirical Analysis
757 F.3d 866 · 2014
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Ed. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., a Corporation, Richard A. Perkins, Counsel for Ed Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., a Corporation, H. O'Neil Shanks, and Norman Stevans, Richard A. Perkins, Counsel For · Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles · Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles · Moreno v. City of Sacramento
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“articulate with sufficient clarity the manner in which it ma[de] its determination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.