Forrest v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Purkett v. Elem · Wright v. State · Jenkins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Upon appellate review, a trial court's decision concerning whether a peremptory challenge is discriminatory is given great deference, and will be set aside only if found to be clearly erroneous.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the juror is a member of a cognizable racial group; (2) [the challenging party] has exercised peremptory challenges to remove that group's members from the jury; and (8) the facts and circumstances of this case raise an inference that the exclusion was based on race.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State · Jones v. State“became the responsibility of the trial court to determine from all the circumstances whether the defendant had proved purposeful racial discrimination by the State.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.