Andersen v. Andersen’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2016
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. Jones · Colman v. Colman · English v. English · Gardner v. Gardner · Rasband v. Rasband
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[flailure to make findings on all material issues is reversible error unless the facts in the record are clear, uncontro-verted, and capable of supporting only a finding in favor of the judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Taft v. Taft“[iIn order to per mit appellate review of a trial court's property distribution in a divorcee proceeding, the distribution should be based upon written findings,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Taft v. Taft“clear, uncontroverted, and capable of supporting only a finding in favor of the judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Howell v. Howell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.