Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 757 P2D 60 - Rice v. Rice

Rice v. Rice’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2006

12 state decisions

90198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kissinger v. Halperin · Seafarers International Union v. Stone · Brooks v. Brooks · Laing v. Laing · Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Realistically, there is such a variety of pension plan designs that it is impossible to develop any one detailed formula that will produce an equitable result in every instance. Once the pension is vested, the trial court can determine whether the present value or the retained jurisdiction approach is appropriate in a given case and adopt that approach to the specific circumstances presented.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “pension rights should generally be awarded to the employee spouse if there is other marital property of appropriate worth which can be awarded to the non-employee spouse”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “repeatedly held that to the extent retirement benefits have been earned during marriage, they constitute marital assets and are subject to equitable division.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.