Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 757 P2D 836 - Glasgow v. Fox

Glasgow v. Fox’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2023

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

8019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mabry v. Baird · 81 Ill. App. 3d 744 - Savage v. Seed · Williams v. Frey · Young v. First State Bank, Watonga · Stevens Expert Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. Stevens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reach the substantive rights of the cause of action and thereby vindicate appellant as to the underlying action.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is well established in Oklahoma that one of the elements a malicious-prosecution plaintiff must affirmatively prove is a successful termination in his favor of the original action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A judgment entered nune pro tune is retrospective, and has the same force and effect as if entered at the time judgment was rendered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.