757 So. 2d 1 - Avenal v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation · Hendler v. United States · RecoverEdge L.P. v. Pentecost · 359 So. 2d 154 - Welch v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“issue already decided by the federal courts. The trial court denied the motion, and the court of appeal agreed, holding on rehearing that the legal standard applied in the federal case was not the same because”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Property shall not be taken or damaged by the state or its political subdivisions except for public purposes and with just compensation paid to the owner or into the court for his benefit.... In every expropriation, ... the owner shall be compensated to the full extent of his loss.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Every person has the right to acquire, own, control, use, enjoy, protect, and dispose of private property. This right is subject to reasonable statutory restrictions and the reasonable exercise of the police power.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.