EB, Inc. v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
April 2010
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McLearn v. Hill · PMZ Oil Co. v. Lucroy · Troop a Riding Academy v. Steverding · 564 So. 2d 1 - Hill v. Thompson · Bright v. Michel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The law does not regard estoppels with favor, nor extend them beyond the requirements of the transaction in which they originate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The doctrine of equitable estoppel should be applied cautiously and only when equity clearly requires it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The doctrine of equitable estoppel is not applied except when to refuse it would be inequitable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.