757 So. 2d 1043 - Moore v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
August 2015
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 437 So. 2d 1003 - Albright v. Albright · 646 So. 2d 1264 - Morreale v. Morreale · 711 So. 2d 884 - Richard v. Richard · McKee v. Flynt · 724 So. 2d 956 - Mixon v. Mixon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“like to have unlimited time in which to present evidence in support of their positions during litigation, Rule 611 of the Mississippi Rules of Evidence is designed to give trial judges some measure of control over the operation of trials and the smooth flow of the litigation process.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“there is no legitimate basis for complaining on appeal about the chancellor's control of evidentiary presentation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.