Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 757 SO2D 1145 - Redmond v. Bankester

Redmond v. Bankester’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2003
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Phillips v. Washington Legal Foundation · Institut Pasteur v. Cambridge Biotech Corp. · McMillian v. We Johnson · 514 So. 2d 922 - Blumberg v. Touche Ross & Co. · 723 So. 2d 634 - Equity Resources Management, Inc. v. Vinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Alabama has not followed the trend of abolishing the requirement that parties be identical, sometimes referred to as the mutuality of estoppel requirement’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.