¶1We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence, but certify direct conflict with Heggs v. State, 718 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), as to the applicable window period.
757 So. 2d 1282
Salazar v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 31, 2000
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-05-31
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 2001
2 state decisions
Relies on 718 So. 2d 263 - Heggs v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2000-05-31
View the full empirical analysis of this case →