Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 757 SO2D 364 - Meeks v. Meeks

Meeks v. Meeks’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 437 So. 2d 410 - Tedford v. Dempsey · 646 So. 2d 1264 - Morreale v. Morreale · 541 So. 2d 1040 - Morris v. Morris · 638 So. 2d 1295 - Shipley v. Ferguson · 692 So. 2d 88 - Overstreet v. Overstreet

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “contempt matters are committed to the substantial discretion of the trial court which, by institutional circumstance and both temporal and visual proximity, is infinitely more competent to decide the matter than we are.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “be events for which allowance could not reasonably have been made at the time of the previous ruling.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “proof on the issue of the unexpected nature to the changes in circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.