757 So. 2d 556 - State v. Kobel’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2013
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 520 So. 2d 250 - State v. Pettis · Valdez v. Moore · Mock v. Mock · 745 So. 2d 979 - Kobel v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the judge determines that there is probable cause to believe that the person is a sexually violent predator, the judge shall order that the person remain in custody and be immediately transferred to an appropriate secure facility if the person's incarcerative sentence expires.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`be maintained in custody and held in an appropriate secure facility for further proceedings in accordance' with the [Jimmy Ryce] Act, Part V of Chapter 394, Florida Statutes (1999). § 394.9135(3), Fla. Stat. (1999).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mitchell“has been interpreted to mandate [an adversarial probable cause hearing] within five days of a request by a detainee whose [prison] sentence has expired.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.