Craft v. Craft’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2020
2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on American States Insurance v. Piasecki · Washington v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. · 386 So. 2d 49 - Puzzo v. Ray · 490 So. 2d 1343 - Mickler v. Aaron
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Ordinarily, a judgment debtor's choses in action may be reached by supplementary proceedings. Narrow exceptions to the broad requirements of this statute and its predecessors were initially drawn in the area of suits for so-called "personal torts," i.e., those for personal injuries such as suits for assault and battery, slander and similar cases. Those suits were considered personal to the plaintiff and have been held not to be assignable, or in other words, not reachable in proceedings supplementary. Craft v. Craft, 757 So.2d 571, 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.