Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 757 SW2D 212 - Skiles v. Commonwealth

Skiles v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. DiFrancesco · Bozza v. United States · State v. Burkhart · Niece v. State · 175 Ga. App. 685 - Wallace v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he rule that a trial court which has imposed an unlawful sentence can correct that sentence at any time appears to be the majority position in those jurisdictions which have considered the matter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the court's subsequent correction of the [unlawful sentence] was not only authorized but required.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the rule [was] sound and [did] not offend any right of the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.