Chaney v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1992
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Sanders v. State · Richardson v. State · Armour v. State · Grippe v. Momtazee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A movant ‘must satisfy both the performance prong and the prejudice prong to prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.’ Sanders v. State, 738 S.W.2d 856, 857 (Mo. banc 1987) (emphasis in original). A motion court and this court may proceed directly to the issue of prejudice without first determining whether counsel’s conduct was deficient.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stark v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.